Page 1 of 9
Rookie of the Year
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 6:34 am
by FoxJones
I don't think there'll be any contest in this one.. if more people would check out the AMVs made by...
Nostromo_vx
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... _id=222270
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 6:42 am
by FoxJones
Stupid me.. forgot that Sivis is also a "rookie"... go figure
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... _id=209751
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:27 am
by JCD
xRinoa
and
Bakadeshi
and the 2 mentioned above
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:36 am
by AquaSky
I've gotta go with
RolltheStampede.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 8:21 am
by Bote
Bakadeshi
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 8:26 am
by DrngdKreationz
now does rookie just mean that the join date is 2004? or started making amvs in 2004 only? the rules don't exactly make that clear
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:24 am
by Scintilla
DrngdKreationz wrote:now does rookie just mean that the join date is 2004? or started making amvs in 2004 only? the rules don't exactly make that clear
I believe that:
1) the member's join date must be 2004 (meaning Bakadeshi wouldn't be eligible)
2) the member must not have any videos listed as having premiered before 2004 (which is why I wasn't eligible last year)
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 1:21 pm
by badmartialarts
Also, the creator should really be a new creator, as in, not having created videos under another name before *cough* or being a paid professional editor who comes in with extensive knowledge already (that second part is my personal view on it, others might argue that). There is no way to really check this unless they are honest, though.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 1:30 pm
by Voices_Of_Ryan
badmartialarts wrote:or being a paid professional editor who comes in with extensive knowledge already (that second part is my personal view on it, others might argue that). There is no way to really check this unless they are honest, though.
To me... that second one is very wrong.
Because alot of people practice before they actually release their first video, and that would be like saying they shouldnt be able to practice for a few years.
A good video is a good video. Period.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:06 pm
by Maverick-Rubik
And then there are a few people like me, who actually edited for the very first time when they made their first video. Yes, the video listed as my first 2 years ago is actually the very first time I've ever edited in a program period.
This is another award I don't think is really sensical either... It always sums up to "first video entered" and not really first made ever.